|
|
f0783eefa4
|
cleanup: made some signals not concurrently conditional
|
2025-05-27 15:19:31 +02:00 |
|
|
|
a84397d626
|
cleanup: renamed variables to simplify.
|
2025-05-23 17:08:58 +02:00 |
|
|
|
07150fe14a
|
cleanup: removed unused signals and state
|
2025-05-23 16:41:41 +02:00 |
|
|
|
9cdcb8cd74
|
cleanup: reduced manager signals kept in state furhter (no io pipelining support for external users) and removed valid and data_out stateful assignment
|
2025-05-23 16:36:07 +02:00 |
|
|
|
5f9783f3b3
|
cleanup: removed instruction type from translator (not used, and currently implied by which translator it is)
|
2025-05-23 15:42:50 +02:00 |
|
|
|
09a5318523
|
cleanup: made manager address be kept in one variable (io pipelined access to ganimede isn't likely)
|
2025-05-23 15:35:41 +02:00 |
|
|
|
cd6ff9a77a
|
made buffers work with valid on rising edge
|
2025-05-23 15:18:57 +02:00 |
|
|
|
23ede53056
|
updated ganimede toplevel to support new socbridge stuff
|
2025-05-22 23:50:30 +02:00 |
|
|
|
b1eee9ce1e
|
reduced complexity in dummy IP. Now works with buffers with no unnecessary stall
|
2025-05-22 23:49:40 +02:00 |
|
|
|
4e4853c540
|
fixed bug which occurs due to socbridge not handling addresses seperately for read and writes
|
2025-05-22 23:48:49 +02:00 |
|
|
|
4682d19720
|
made reads not start if read buffer is too full
|
2025-05-22 23:33:54 +02:00 |
|
|
|
1146970be5
|
Multipacket socbridge works??
|
2025-05-21 23:20:10 +02:00 |
|
|
|
1be1f1bc63
|
added initial multi in-flight packets attempt, limited by receiving socbridge
|
2025-05-21 21:10:58 +02:00 |
|
